Swenson v. Legacy Health System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's summary judgment motion was inappropriate because defendant's actions could have frustrated plaintiff's objectively reasonable expectation
• holding that, “in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, an employer has the right to modify benefits unilaterally and prospectively; by continuing to work after learning of it, an employee impliedly accepts that modification”
• “As a matter of law, the promise of an at-will employee to continue in an employer’s service for some specified future period of time constitutes consideration for an additional benefit promised by the employer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).