Skip to main content
· 11/26/1897

Swenson v. Christopherson

Citations

  • 10 S.D. 342
  • 73 N.W. 96
  • 1897 S.D. LEXIS 65

Syllabus

<p>1. A rule of the supreme court providing that the size of type for printing briefs shall not be smaller than small pica, does not prohibit the use of a larger type.</p> <p>2. A party should be allowed as costs the amount he paid for printing addi- • tional abstracts and brief, where such was the usual price.</p> <p>8. A respondent will not be allowed costs for printing unnecessary matter in additional abstract, nor extended quotations from text-books and reports in his brief.</p>

Judges: Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.