Sweitzer v. American Express Centurion Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff could not expand the theory of its negligence claim in response to a motion for summary judgment
• noting that “[t]he majority consensus among the courts that have addressed the issue is that ... § 1681s-2(b) created a private right of action by a consumer against a data furnisher,” and declining to follow the minority view espoused in Zamos

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).