Skip to main content
· 7/1/1858

Sweetland v. Hill

Citations

  • 9 Cal. 556

Syllabus

<p>The removal of an enolosure of land, for the purpose of replacing it with a better one, so far from being evidence of an intention to abandon the premises, is direct evidence of the contrary.</p> <p>An entry with full notice of plaintiff’s rights, during a temporary removal of bis enclosure, can not be defended on the ground that the lands were unenclosed.</p>

Judges: Burnett, Terry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.