· 7/1/1858
Sweetland v. Hill
Citations
- 9 Cal. 556
Syllabus
<p>The removal of an enolosure of land, for the purpose of replacing it with a better one, so far from being evidence of an intention to abandon the premises, is direct evidence of the contrary.</p> <p>An entry with full notice of plaintiff’s rights, during a temporary removal of bis enclosure, can not be defended on the ground that the lands were unenclosed.</p>
Judges: Burnett, Terry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.