Skip to main content
· 2/7/1986

Sweeting v. Pa. State Police

Citations

  • 503 A.2d 1126
  • 95 Pa. Commw. 45
  • 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that probationary trooper does not have a property interest in continued employment
  • dismissed probationary state troopers have no substantive property right that would require holding a due process hearing before they were discharged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, Kalish, Palladino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.