Sweetarts, a Corporation v. Sunline, Inc., and Menlo F. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party who sought registration on the Supplemental Register was not estopped from arguing at trial that its marks had achieved secondary meaning pre-registration
• finding that sales of candy totaling less than $75 were de minimis but finding an issue of material fact where annual sales of candy ranged from $1,000 to $20,000
• finding as to bad faith in trademark infringement action is reviewed for clear error
• plaintiff's prior use of trademark within a given market area entitles it to exclusive use of that mark within that area
• plaintiff’s prior use of trademark within a given market area entitles it to exclusive use of that mark within that area
• in the context of holding that plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief, stating that plaintiff need not show actual or monetary injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).