Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 9/6/2005
Sweet v. State
Citations
- 882 A.2d 296
- 163 Md. App. 676
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- preponderance of the evidence is the appropriate standard when a defendant challenges registration as a sexually violent predator
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Adkins, Meredith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Care & Treatment of Murrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2007-02-13· cited 60×
- F.D.R. Srour Partnership v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-27· cited 9×
- Jeandell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-06· cited 5×
- State v. RogersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-28· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-23· cited 79×
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-30· cited 54×
- Sweet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-30· cited 47×
- Starke v. StarkeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-03· cited 25×
- Rouse-Fairwood Limited Partnership v. Supervisor of Assessments of Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-07· cited 23×
- Faulkner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-01-01· cited 4×
- Deyesu v. DonhauserCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-02· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.