Skip to main content
· 5/2/2002

Sweet v. Pace Membership Warehouse, Inc.

Citations

  • 795 A.2d 524
  • 2002 R.I. LEXIS 86
  • 2002 WL 850820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding video tapes admissible as substantive evidence and remanding with instructions that trial court may consider other objections, including whether probative value of evidence is substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice
  • reversing trial court’s decision to exclude post-accident surveillance video and directing trial court, on remand, to evaluate admissibility of video under Rule 403
  • reversing trial court’s decision to exclude post-accident surveillance video and directing trial court, on remand, to evaluate admissibility of video under Rule 403
  • reversing trial court's decision to exclude post-accident surveillance video and directing trial court, on remand, to evaluate admissibility of video under Rule 403
  • trial court erred in excluding videos without reviewing first; on remand, \the trial justice should review the tapes and evaluate their admissibility under Rule 403\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lederberg, Bourcier, Flanders, Goldberg, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.