Sweesy v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court needs “reasonably verifiable evidence” of date inmate deposits appeal, including, but not limited to, “certificates of mailing, cash slips, affidavits, and prison operating procedures”
• holding that court needs “reasonably verifiable evidence of date inmate deposits appeal, including but not limited to, “certificates of mailing, cash slips, affidavits, and prison operating procedures”
• holding that the court needs “reasonably verifiable evidence” of the date an inmate deposits an appeal, including, for example, “certificates of mailing, cash slips, affidavits, and prison operating procedures”
• applying prisoner mailbox rule in the context of administrative appeals made to the Board
• due to the Court’s inability to ascertain from the record when the 3 prisoner placed his appeal of the Board’s decision in the prison mailbox, we vacated and remanded the matter for a factual determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).