Sweeny v. Sweeny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking requirement that husband secure his alimony obligation with a life insurance policy because wife received large equitable distribution and had the ability to work to support herself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• John G. McKnight v. Nancy L. McKnight
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-01

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Amendments to Guidelines for Taxation
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-11-17· cited 44×
• Ruberg v. Ruberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-07· cited 21×
• Kearley v. Kearley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-08· cited 16×
• Chandler v. Chandler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-04-02· cited 10×
• MacKoul v. MacKoul
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-20· cited 9×
• Robbins v. McGrath
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-30· cited 8×
• Lapham v. Lapham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-23· cited 7×
• Bohner v. Bohner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-02· cited 2×