Skip to main content
· 12/3/1889

Sweeney v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

Citations

  • 38 Mo. App. 154
  • 1889 Mo. App. LEXIS 434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that a court must construe a stipulation like a contract and, therefore, “a stipulation that is unambiguous and explicit must be construed according to the terms the parties have used, as those terms are understood in their plain, ordinary, and popular sense”
  • appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the PSC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.