Skip to main content
· 4/2/1962

Sweeney v. Illinois

Citations

  • 369 U.S. 840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that introducing broker, who was dis- closed agent of clearing broker, could take advantage of arbitration clause in client-clearing broker agreement
  • two-year delay, with active participation in discovery process, not a waiver of the right to compel arbitration
  • the Eighth Circuit relied on the holdings in Cauble and Okcuoglu to find that the introducing broker could enforce the margin agreement as a third party beneficiary and as the disclosed agent of the clearing broker
  • requiring arbitration of Rule 10b-5 claims after McMahon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.