Sweeney v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• any provision in UM coverage that allows reduction of amounts paid to insured pursuant to workers’ compensation claim is against public policy and therefore void and unenforceable
• any provision in UM coverage that allows reduction of amounts paid to insured pursuant to workers' compensation claim is against public policy and therefore void and unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).