Skip to main content
· 11/12/2013

Sweeney v. Brown

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 620
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 398
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3279
  • 571 U.S. 1007
  • 2013 WL 4776739
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a 2 district court has the duty to sua sponte consider reasonable alternatives to 3 closure” but finding no error where court adequately justified closure
  • relying on affidavit to provide detail supporting overriding interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.