Skip to main content
· 12/2/1987

Sweener v. First Baptist Church of Emporium

Citations

  • 533 A.2d 998
  • 516 Pa. 534
  • 1987 Pa. LEXIS 833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellant’s introduction of testimony on assumed point of impact is conceded on cross-examination to be merely speculative; appellant cannot then complain about its introduction when the basis therefor is revealed on cross-examination
  • appellant's introduction of testimony on assumed point of impact is conceded on cross-examination to be merely speculative; appellant cannot then complain about its introduction when the basis therefor is revealed on cross-examination
  • appellant cannot complain about introduction of evidence when basis therefor is revealed on cross-examination
  • after entry of summary judgment, party filed post-trial motions which were denied six months later, and party appealed; court held entry of summary judgment was final order from which any appeal was waived unless taken within thirty days
  • “[a] pivotal consideration in determining whether an order is final and appealable is whether the plaintiff aggrieved by it has, for purposes of the particular action, been put “out of court” on all theories of recovery asserted against a given defendant for a given loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Former

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.