Swedler ex rel. Swedler v. Pearce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that However, a party that wishes to appeal an interlocutory, non- appealable order, such as the one sub judice, may seek a determination of finality by the trial court, as provided in subsection (c), in relevant part: (c
• finding two orders from which plaintiff appealed were interlocutory and unappealable, where orders sustained preliminary objections and disposed of some but not all of the parties or claims
• quashing appeal from orders that did not dispose of all claims or parties as interlocutory and unappealable
• quashing appeal from orders that disposed of fewer than all asserted claims
• “[O]rders granting preliminary objections and disposing of only some but not all of the underlying parties or claims are interlocutory and unappealable.”
• “Generally, only final orders are appealable, and final orders are defined as orders disposing of all claims of all parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).