Swedish Civil Aviation Admin. v. Project Management Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “there is no independent tort for breach of fiduciary duty in Maryland, especially in light of the multiple alternative remedies” available to the plaintiff
• holding that quasi-contract remedies may be asserted in the alternative to a contract claim concerning the same subject matter
• concluding that “there is no independent tort for breach of fiduciary duty in Maryland”
• holding that “[u]ntil an express contract is proven, a motion to dismiss a claim for promissory estoppel or unjust enrichment on these grounds is premature” and permitting the plaintiff to plead “both contract and quasi-contract claims in the alternative”
• explaining that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow parties to state claims “regardless of consistency”
• noting that a party may plead both breach of contract and quantum meruit despite the fact that it may not recover under both theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).