Sweat v. Crawford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding omissions from the record did not prejudice appellant because the evidence included in the record sufficiently supported the findings of fact made by the referee
• finding omissions from the record did not prejudice appellant because the evidence included in the record sufficiently supported the findings of fact made by the referee and concurred in by the circuit court
• unmeritorious argument regarding trial court’s determination of damages does not warrant further consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).