Swearingen v. McGee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Whether an expert can rely on case reports or whether a court can admit the case reports themselves into evidence are two entirely different questions.\
• “It is true that case reports and anecdotal evidence alone may not be sufficient support for a causation opinion. . . . However, case reports considered in conjunction with other evidence may be an appropriate basis for an expert’s causation opinion.”
• “It is true that case reports and anecdotal evidence alone may not be sufficient support for a causation opinion. . . . However, case reports considered in conjunction with other evidence may be an appropriate basis for an expert’s causation opinion.”
• “It is true that case reports and anecdotal evidence alone may not be sufficient support for a causation opinion. . . . However, case reports considered in conjunction with other evidence may be an appropriate basis for an expert’s causation opinion.”
• “It is true that case reports and anecdotal evidence alone may not be sufficient support for a causation opinion. . . . However, case reports considered in conjunction with other evidence may be an appropriate basis for an expert’s causation opinion.”
• “It is true that case reports and anecdotal evidence alone may not be sufficient support for a causation opinion. . . . However, case reports considered in conjunction with other evidence may be an appropriate basis for an expert’s causation opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).