Swatman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that costs should have been imposed only once for the entire case, without discussing the underlying statute upon which those costs were assessed
• holding that costs should have been imposed only once for the entire case, without discussing the underlying statute upon which those costs were assessed
• “[T]he court erred in imposing all remaining costs separately for each count of the information and should have imposed the costs only once for the entire case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).