Skip to main content
· 5/26/2009

Swaters v. Osmus

Citations

  • 568 F.3d 1315
  • 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 296
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11112
  • 2009 WL 1448953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency’s findings from being supported by substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus, Pryor, Schlesinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.