· 5/26/2009
Swaters v. Osmus
Citations
- 568 F.3d 1315
- 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 296
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11112
- 2009 WL 1448953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency’s findings from being supported by substantial evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marcus, Pryor, Schlesinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.