Swartzberg v. Lockwood (In Re Lockwood)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing why “ ‘[s]upportf for a former spouse is not synonymous with ‘support’ for children, and it is appropriate in the bankruptcy context to recognize that difference”
• Rios requirement met where Wisconsin guardian ad litem statute \require[d] that an attorney be hired to represent the [debtor's] children\
• “Both economic and noneconomic factors can be vital to children’s interests, and separating these factors is not realistic.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).