Swartz v. Gale Webb Transportation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an injury that carries the risk of complications is more significant than one that does not include this risk and ... expert testimony [is] properly admitted to assist the jury in determining the nature and extent of ... injuries”
• “[t]o preserve an alleged error in admitting evidence' for appellate review, a party must make a timely and valid objection and receive an adverse ruling”
• “That [plaintiff’s] present injury brings with it this increased risk of future injury ‘is information the jury should have in the difficult task of trying to give plaintiff’s condition a dollar value.’” (citation omitted)
• plaintiff merely “at risk” of requiring future surgery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).