Skip to main content
· 1/23/1843

Swartwout v. Wyckoff

Citations

  • 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 70
  • 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that gross negligence and breach of fiduciary duty are not preempted by the Martin Act
  • discussing split of authority and concluding that the Martin Act does not preempt common law claims
  • “The plain language of the Martin Act does not explicitly preempt all common-law claims.”
  • “An investment advisor may be considered a professional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.