· 1/23/1843
Swartwout v. Wyckoff
Citations
- 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 70
- 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that gross negligence and breach of fiduciary duty are not preempted by the Martin Act
- discussing split of authority and concluding that the Martin Act does not preempt common law claims
- “The plain language of the Martin Act does not explicitly preempt all common-law claims.”
- “An investment advisor may be considered a professional.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.