Swanson v. Florida Bar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff had “no support for a claim of retaliation” because she failed to “show[] that whoever was responsible for” her reassign‐ ments and denials of overtime “was aware of her protected activity or was involved in the later actions”
• concluding that plaintiff had “no support for a claim of retaliation” because she failed to “show[] that whoever was responsible for” her reassign‐ ments and denials of overtime “was aware of her protected activity or was involved in the later actions”
• concluding that plaintiff had “no support for a claim of retaliation” because she failed to “show[] that whoever was responsible for” her reassign‐ ments and denials of overtime “was aware of her protected activity or was involved in the later actions”
• holding a claimant’s failure to exhaust the prescribed administrative procedures deprives the district court of jurisdiction
• noting that judicial review of administrative decisions 3 by the SSA is limited to a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security
• noting that judicial review of 10 administrative decisions by the SSA is limited to a final decision of the Commissioner of Social 11 Security

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).