Skip to main content
· 1/15/1874

Swannell v. Watson

Citations

  • 71 Ill. 456

Syllabus

<p>Fraud and oircumvbrtion—not available as a defense against suit by the assignee of a note, when defendant has been negligent. Where the fraud and circumvention in procuring the execution of a note, relied on as a defense, in a suit by an innocent assignee, was, that the maker was unable to read, and that the payee, who was a stranger, read it to him as another kind of instrument, and that he relied upon such reading, and on the strength of it signed the note, and it appeared that, at the time, there were several of his neighbors and acquaintances present, and he did not ask them to read the note for him, it was held, that there was not sufficient diligence and precaution shown to prevent a recovery.</p>

Judges: Craig

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.