Skip to main content
· 1/27/1958

Swank v. Edmonds

Citations

  • 228 Ark. 562
  • 309 S.W.2d 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statutory mailing requirement satisfied due process concerns regardless of actual notice
  • “Due process requires notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.” (punctuation omitted) (emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.