Swanberg v. Corporation.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• calling a result in which application of the § 12-119 statute of limitations would have left plaintiff with only six days to file an appeal “bizarre”
• “[t]he law favors a rational statutory construction and we presume that the legislature intended a sensible result” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “[i]t necessarily follows that if a statute of limitations would have barred a claim asserted in an action for relief other than a declaratory judgment, then the same limitation period will bar the same claim asserted in a declaratory judgment action” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• interpreting General Statutes §§ 12-89, 12-111, 12-118 and 12-119

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).