Swan v. Villas Condominium Unit Owners Assn.
Citations
- 246 N.E.3d 1031
- 2024 Ohio 2313
Syllabus
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT – MOTION TO ENFORCE – CONTRACT – MEETING OF THE MINDS: In the absence of evidence that the parties intended for a settlement agreement to be contingent upon the execution of a signed writing, the trial court did not err in granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement that was only signed by one of the parties. The trial court did not err in granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement where the parties reached a meeting of the minds as to all of the agreement's essential terms.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a minor deviation for personal reasons is outside the scope of employment, but recognizing that employees can return to its course and scope
- “Instructions . . . are sufficient if they fairly and 6 1 correctly state the applicable law.”
- the party alleging the affirmative has the burden of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.