Washington Supreme Court· 12/7/1950
Swan v. O'LEARY
Citations
- 225 P.2d 199
- 37 Wash. 2d 533
- 1950 Wash. LEXIS 447
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a deed granting a strip of land “‘for the purpose of a Railroad right-of-way’” conveyed an easement “for railroad purposes” (emphasis in original)
- holding that a grant “for the purpose of a Railroad right-of-way” was an easement that was abandoned when a logging railroad terminated its operations
- court finds easement even though deed also conveyed “strip of land” “forever” — although conveyance was by quitclaim deed rather than warranty deed
- where the deed is a mixture of two ideas the easement conclusion follows
- “To Have and to Hold All and singular the said premises together with the appurtenances, unto said party of the second part, and to his heirs and assigns forever.” (emphasis omitted)
- granted property “for the purpose of a Railroad right-of-way . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grady, Donworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1986-12-24· cited 100×
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-04-25· cited 92×
- Harris v. Ski Park Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 75×
- Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1996-10-17· cited 56×
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1986-03-27· cited 51×
- King County v. RasmussenNinth Circuit· 2002-08-09· cited 41×
- Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Yakima Interurban Lines Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 2006-01-12· cited 28×
- Kiely v. GravesWashington Supreme Court· 2012-03-01· cited 27×
- Ray v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-15· cited 22×
- Hanson Industries, Inc. v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-12-05· cited 21×
- Haggart v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-12-18· cited 21×
- Roeder Co. v. K & E Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-05-30· cited 19×
- Scott v. WallitnerWashington Supreme Court· 1956-06-21· cited 18×
- Zobrist v. CulpCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-10-12· cited 15×
- State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. HessSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-29· cited 14×
- Beres v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-04-05· cited 14×
- BNSF Ry. Co. v. Box Creek Mineral Ltd. P'shipWyoming Supreme Court· 2018-06-18· cited 11×
- King County v. RasmussenW.D. Washington· 2001-05-25· cited 10×
- Dossett v. New Orleans Great Northern Railroad Co.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 8×
- Arnhold v. United StatesW.D. Washington· 1958-06-23· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.