Swan v. Nation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• § 1581 (i) does not provide jurisdiction for the CIT when the protest procedure of § 1581(b) covers the action
• in a case in which the CIT erroneously assumed jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i) instead of 28 U.S.C. § 1581(b
• “[Plaintiffs] may not circumvent the proper jurisdictional statute by asserting that their decision not to proceed under the proper congressional mechanism renders their available remedies manifestly inadequate.” (citation omitted)
• “The APA cannot be used to circumvent properly authorized statutory relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).