Swan-Day Lumber Co. v. Boling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on the insurer's notes regarding its valuation of the claim to conclude that the insurer did not act in bad faith.
• “[T]he Claims Administration Statute, Fla. Stat. 627.426, applies only to preclude particular coverage defenses and is therefore not relevant to a determination of whether there is a valid Coblentz agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).