Swaine v. Blackmore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, where the insured’s scope of work included taping and sealing blue board insulation, that exclusion j.(6)5 applied to preclude coverage for the cost of removing and replacing masonry, which had to be removed to gain access to the blue board when the tape failed
• “The court must construe ambiguous terms in an insurance policy liberally in favor of the insured and strictly against the insurer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).