Skip to main content
· 8/20/1919

Swafford v. Carnation Lumber & Shingle Co.

Citations

  • 108 Wash. 305
  • 183 P. 92
  • 1919 Wash. LEXIS 850

Syllabus

<p>New Trial (23)—Conflicting Evidence—Discretion. It is not an abuse of discretion to refuse a new trial for insufficiency of the evidence where the testimony was in direct conflict and made questions for the jury, which were submitted on instructions that were not excepted to.</p>

Judges: Mount

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.