Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Fifth Amendment guarantees petitioners the right to “reasonably present! ]” his or her case
• holding that the Fifth Amendment guarantees petitioners the right to “reasonably present[]” his or her case
• noting that this Court’s review is limited to the administrative record that was the basis for the order of removal
• explaining that we review the IJ’s decision only when the BIA adopts the IJ’s reasoning or summarily affirms the IJ’s decision without providing an explanation
• “Assuming, without deciding, that judicial review properly is employed to assess whether the BIA correctly designated a case for summary affirmance....”
• noting that streamlining cases receive full consideration from the BIA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).