Svienty v. Whirlpool Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employer simultaneously considered employee’s working for another employer while calling in sick and lying about it, “theft,” “insubordination” and “gross misconduct”
• fact that employer’s policy did not expressly define the term “gross misconduct” did not preclude employer from concluding that plaintiff’s actions constituted gross misconduct when the employer provided a reasonable and honest explanation for its determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).