Skip to main content
· 7/22/2004

Svege v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.

Citations

  • 329 F. Supp. 2d 272
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14809
  • 2004 WL 1737564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining the defendant was a “product seller” because it held title to the product, the product was purchased by the buyer pursuant to a marketing program the defendant helped create, and the defendant had helped finance a large portion of the product’s overall sales

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.