SUZMAR, LLC v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH MIAMI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in denying certain parties the right to intervene and concluding that \the entire merits of the case must be reopened to give [those parties] an opportunity to be heard as of right as intervenors\
• stating that California could intervene to represent the interests of its citizens even though the United States had brought the suit and presumably was the party with parens patriae standing to represent California’s citizens
• allowing intervention by gas company into an antitrust dispute between the government and the company’s supplier because that dispute would affect its access to product
• allowing the state of California to intervene to protect its interests in a competitive natural gas market
• intervention of right allowed where government's settlement of antitrust suit would frustrate mandate of Court
• State of California permitted intervention as of right in antitrust action involving local gas supplier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).