Skip to main content
· 11/5/1992

Sutton v. Holland (In Re Holland)

Citations

  • 155 B.R. 745
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2334
  • 1992 WL 500889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in connection with creditor’s motion for summary judgment based on the collateral estoppel effect of a default judgment, “the Court will accept the debtor’s representations as true, and assume that he did not receive information of the trial date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Basil H. Lorch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.