Skip to main content
· 2/10/1999

Sutton v. Herbert

Citations

  • 39 F. Supp. 2d 335
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1474
  • 1999 WL 65699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prosecutor’s comments during summation were proper; “[commenting on the evidence presented at trial is a typical — indeed necessary — part of any summation, and is not error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.