Skip to main content
· 2/4/1960

Sutton v. Diimmel

Citations

  • 349 P.2d 226
  • 55 Wash. 2d 592
  • 1960 Wash. LEXIS 541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • facts similar to those here, except defendant was a manufacturer as opposed to a lessor/repairer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mallery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.