Skip to main content
· 6/30/2000

Suttle Ex Rel. Central Trust Bank v. Lake Forest Hosp.

Citations

  • 315 Ill. App. 3d 96
  • 733 N.E.2d 726
  • 248 Ill. Dec. 51
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court's grant of a new trial, because of plaintiff's prejudicial argument, reversed
  • “In the instant case, there is testimony that [the physician] diagnosed [the patient] as suffering from respiratory distress syndrome, rather than hypovolemic shock, because he was unaware of [the patient’s] velamentous insertion” (emphasis in original
  • trial court's grant of a new trial, because of plaintiff's prejudicial argument, reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.