Skip to main content
· 4/22/1999

Sutter v. Payne

Citations

  • 989 S.W.2d 887
  • 337 Ark. 330
  • 1999 Ark. LEXIS 195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, “[m]any inconsistent statements are so insignificant as to be meaningless and others are so easily explainable as to not justify being presented at trial”
  • “Arkansas has long recognized the common-defense doctrine, which provides that an answer that is timely filed by a co-defendant inures to the benefit of a defaulting co-defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.