Skip to main content
· 10/26/1992

Sutter v. King

Citations

  • 310 Ark. 681
  • 839 S.W.2d 218
  • 1992 Ark. LEXIS 624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a typographical error in a security deed does not necessarily invalidate the legal description” when the deed also referred to the property’s physical address
  • stating that payment or tender of the principal and interest due on the loan is “a prerequisite” to a claim to set aside a foreclosure sale
  • “Unjust enrichment is an equitable principle that may apply when there is no legal contract between the parties.”
  • a party may not maintain a claim for the breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing absent a valid breach of contract claim
  • “Because the Ceasars did not assert a breach of contract claim, their claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing failed as a matter of law.”
  • “Because the [borrowers] did not assert a breach of contract claim, their claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing failed as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.