· 10/26/1992
Sutter v. King
Citations
- 310 Ark. 681
- 839 S.W.2d 218
- 1992 Ark. LEXIS 624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a typographical error in a security deed does not necessarily invalidate the legal description” when the deed also referred to the property’s physical address
- stating that payment or tender of the principal and interest due on the loan is “a prerequisite” to a claim to set aside a foreclosure sale
- “Unjust enrichment is an equitable principle that may apply when there is no legal contract between the parties.”
- a party may not maintain a claim for the breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing absent a valid breach of contract claim
- “Because the Ceasars did not assert a breach of contract claim, their claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing failed as a matter of law.”
- “Because the [borrowers] did not assert a breach of contract claim, their claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing failed as a matter of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.