Sutro v. Rhodes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing Kirby as holding that the introduction 24 of “certified copies of convictions of three individuals for theft of government property as evidence in the prosecution of Kirby for being in receipt of that stolen property ... violated Kirby’s Sixth Amendment rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).