Skip to main content

Sutherland v. Sutherland

Citations

  • 958 A.2d 235
  • 2008 WL 1932374
  • 2008 Del. Ch. LEXIS 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting investigation that reported only “innocent, generally available” evidence
  • finding one-person committee was independent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.