Skip to main content
· 9/28/1993

Sutherland v. Illinois Bell

Citations

  • 627 N.E.2d 145
  • 254 Ill. App. 3d 983
  • 194 Ill. Dec. 29
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 1484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the state court had jurisdiction over the plaintiffs claim against a telephone company for charging her for services she never ordered because the case' was an ordinary breach of contract claim that did not require the rate-setting expertise of the ICC
  • same, over claim that utility charged for services that were not ordered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scariano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.