Sutherland v. Delaware Water Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendants’ 10 statements about a possible threat of copyright action insufficient to trigger a duty to 11 preserve evidence because “[a] general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to 12 preserve evidence.”
• “As soon as a potential claim is identified, a litigant is under a duty 13 to preserve evidence which it knows or reasonably should know is relevant to the 14 action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).