· 1/7/1964
Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
Citations
- 413 Pa. 324
- 197 A.2d 44
- 1964 Pa. LEXIS 675
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to classify the trespass as continuing when defendant installed a sewer line across plaintiff's property
- refusing to classify the trespass as continuing when defendant installed a sewer line across plaintiffs property
- treating actions “effecting] a permanent change in the condition of the land” as permanent trespasses
- reasoning 6 that res judicata applies “not only as to those matters that actually were litigated, but also of those matters which could have been litigated therein”
- settlement entered into midway through trial with approved court order to settle, discontinue and end
- “As between the parties involved, the settlement and discontinuance had the same effect as the entry of a judgment for the defendant in the proceedings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.