Skip to main content
· 1/7/1964

Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Citations

  • 413 Pa. 324
  • 197 A.2d 44
  • 1964 Pa. LEXIS 675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to classify the trespass as continuing when defendant installed a sewer line across plaintiff's property
  • refusing to classify the trespass as continuing when defendant installed a sewer line across plaintiffs property
  • treating actions “effecting] a permanent change in the condition of the land” as permanent trespasses
  • reasoning 6 that res judicata applies “not only as to those matters that actually were litigated, but also of those matters which could have been litigated therein”
  • settlement entered into midway through trial with approved court order to settle, discontinue and end
  • “As between the parties involved, the settlement and discontinuance had the same effect as the entry of a judgment for the defendant in the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.