Sussman v. Crews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Lanning requires courts to “apply the interpretation that has the best chance of fulfilling BAPCPA’s purpose of maximizing creditor recoveries”
• Lanning requires courts to “apply the interpretation that has the best chance of fulfilling BAPCPA’s purpose of maximizing creditor recoveries”
• distinguishing the interpretation of a debtor’s applicable commitment period from the calculation of a debtor’s projected disposable income, the latter of which was addressed by the Supreme Court in Lan-ning
• stating “if, upon notice of a change in circumstances, a trustee wants to include newly acquired property of the estate in a debtor's plan, it is incumbent upon the trustee to move for a plan modification . . .”
• “[T]he discretion Lanning affords . . . does not permit the court to alter the items to be included in and excluded from income.”
• “[T]he discretion Lanning affords ... does not permit the court to alter the items to be included in and excluded from income.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).